I am a recent graphic design graduate and went to an interview for a Production Assistant at an established publishing company. The job would involve typesetting long documents, books and study materials in Quark or InDesign.
I have not “typeset” long documents before and the thought of having to read and typeset a 600 page book in a couple of days seems daunting.
Does anyone have any advice for me about typesetting in general, or know of any good websites/books which would help me get a head start if i do get the job??
The other people in the publishing department have not come from a design background, so I was slightly confused. I think of typesetting as a creative job is it not? They have said this isn’t a design job.
Am i right or am I right? Any advice would be appreciated.
When a prospective employer says it's not a design job, believe them: it's not a design job.
They want a production person so, yes, you'll be typesetting. This does not necessarily mean you'll be typing things in manually (although you may be); you will most probably simply be flowing in text from word processor / ascii files. And you'll no doubt be using specs provided by the art director/actual book designer. What you'll mainly be doing, I'd surmise, is preparing files for the printing process.
If you want a design job, my advice would be to look further. However, there is also nothing like some practical production experience, so you might want to give it a try for a bit while you look elsewhere. If you take that route, be sure to absorb as much production knowledge as you possibly can -- production knowledge will serve you well in design work!
I highly recommend you purchase The Chicago Manual of Style [http://www.chicagomanualofstyle.org/]. I'm an occasional typesetter and have found this to be an invaluable resource. My copy is dog-eared and tattered, but well worn and loved--I couldn't set type without it! --C
Yeah, what Nance said: typesetting really isn't a design job. And many designers have no clue how to do it, which I think becomes a handicap when they try to specify designs for book interiors: they don't understand what needs to be spec'd, they don't understand how to express their wishes unambiguously, and they don't understand why the pages don't always come out looking the way they imagined them.
I wouldn't necessarily advise you to take this job--you might find that you enjoy typesetting, but it's probably not what you went to design school for--but I do recommend that you try your hand at typesetting long documents at least a couple of times. It's a totally different process from designing an ad or a brochure or a CD booklet.
Note, meanwhile, that if you *are* typesetting, you absolutely are not expected to read the books. In fact, if you do try to read them, you'll never get your work done. But you must be able to skim a manuscript quickly, identifying special problems and elements that need to be styled.
You must also have a firm grasp of copyediting and proofreading markup (the Chicago Manual is a good resource for this), as you'll be not only typesetting the raw manuscript, but also entering corrections to subsequent passes. And it helps to have some knowledge of the editorial conventions of the field in which you're typesetting (textbooks tend to use different styles from those of trade books--e.g., different punctuation, different rules about spelling), as well as a modicum of tact: If you are at all alert, you will spot unmarked editorial errors as you work. Some of the people you are typesetting for will want you to report these; others will not want to hear about them. Don't pretend you're illiterate, but don't be a pest, either.
And you must know how to use your layout program, *really*. There are a lot of tricks to making copy fit and look good, most of which you'll probably have to learn through trial and error unless you're lucky enough to have a helpful and patient colleague. If you're curious, technologically savvy, and enjoy playing with software, you can ace this. If you rarely look at your programs' defaults or preferences and aren't interested in figuring out what all those cryptic commands listed on your application menus do, you're going to turn out homely pages, and you'll probably find the work extremely tedious.
Regarding references to help you if you get the job, yes, you should familiarize yourself with the specific style guide for the field or company you're working in, if there is one, as well as the ubiquitous and wonderful Chicago Manual. You don't need to memorize these references, but you ought to know what they contain and how they're organized, so that you can look things up quickly when you need to. You should also be aware of the general differences between one style and another, e.g., Associated Press style versus Chicago style, as this will help you interpret the instructions you receive.
James Felici's _Complete Manual of Typography_ is the only book I've seen that addresses copyfitting from a practical, digital standpoint. I'd love to hear of others.
As for learning your software, trying to solve real problems is the best method I know of. But at the very least, make sure you know how to set tabs, create paragraph rules, type different kinds of spaces (nonbreaking, em, en, hair), force a word to hyphenate or stay closed, set H&Js, and create and use style sheets. And if you're using Quark, I recommend that you learn how to export, edit, and import tagged text--sometimes dumping a chunk of copy into a text editor (such as BBEdit) and search-and-replacing xtags into or out of it is the fastest way to style it the way you want. This not only garners geek cred, but it can also save you a few thousand clicks per week. (It's not necessary with InDesign, where there are usually other ways to skin those cats.)
For the aspiring book designer, I really think production experience is most useful before you design. All too often I see signs--hell, I did layout on a book a year or two back--where it seemed that the designer was so caught up in her design being unique and perfectly pleasing to herself that we did a lot of "do-overs" and improving to the design throughout the typesetting phase. It blew any illusion of being on a schedule and I ended up billing about twice as much on the corrections/changes phase as I did on the initial layout. Clearly. a book designer ought to be grounded in production in order to understand that there are certain practicalities worth observing. Being the "perfect artiste" does not serve the business end of publishing; and if you want to earn a living as a book designer, you need to always be conscious that book publishing is a business that the designer needs to fit onto.
That said, there's a whole host of reading I think it helps to be familiar with in order to work at becoming an effective book designer--Bringhurst's _Elements of Typographic Style_ and _Designing Books_ by Hochuli and Kinross jump to mind. Rich Hendel has a very nice book on the subject, as well. And I try to take up the subject on my blog at http://www.tianodesign.com/blog. I'm told by some that I share some worthwhile thoughts on the subject.
Back to your original question, however ... Design is creative; typesetting is, too, but only to the extent that you need to think on your feet at times to come up with solutions for implementing the designer's instructions in cost-effectinve and no-insanity-inducing ways. But they typesetter's art is not to make their own creativity visible. That is the designer's realm. And you'll be a better designer to the degree you "get" that.
Stephen Tiano Book Designer, Page COmpositor and Layout Artist http://www.tianodesign.com
This forum is proudly sponsored by Datapage International who have provided typesetting services for over 20 years to international publishers. Concept and online marketing by Online Traction LLC.